Motivating Students and Improving Quality of Learning Using Peer-Reviews
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper reports about a pedagogical experiment at Zaporozhye National University (ZNU) aiming at improving motivation and learning quality in Computer Science Bachelor programme. The major novelty in teaching and learning practice introduced in the experiment was the use of peer evaluation for the assessment of coursework reports in two disciplines – one in the II-nd and the other in the IV-th year of study. The results were compared to the historical data collected in the previous 3-4 years. Our experiment proved that exploiting students’ aspirations for informal leadership and incurred competition constructively is effective and yields some increase in motivation to learn and learning quality. The assessments were also subjectively regarded as more clear and better justified by the students involved in the experiment. A good side effect is also that the students learn the working patterns of the professionals in their field broadly used in academia and industry for making qualitative and unbiased peer evaluations.
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of the efficacy of peer-learning method in nutrition students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Introduction: One of notable initiatives in improving the academic educationis to use the abilities of students to learn together in a new and effective system of peer learning. In this regard, Education Development Center in Shiraz university of Medical Sciences proceed to implementation and study of the curriculum and teaching methods course in the form of peer learning for college students o...
متن کاملThe Comparative Effects of Self-assessment and Peer Feedback on Improving Translation Quality
This study investigated the effect of self-assessment and peer-assessment on the quality of students’ transla- tion. Participants of the study were 60 male and female students. They were selected from the senior stu- dents studying English Translation and divided into two groups: self-assessment and peer-assessment. The study adopted a pretest-posttest design, and students’ translation quality ...
متن کاملPeer Assessment in evaluation of Medical sciences students
Introduction: Recently, peer assessment is especially noticed as a progress evaluation method. Although it is a known method, it is a novel method in many countries that they use traditional methods. Then the topic of current review article is peer assessment in medical education. Methods: The documents related to peer assessment, advantages, disadvantages, applications and how use it extracte...
متن کاملComparison of Lecture and Puzzle for Teaching Medical Emergency to Anesthesiology Students: Students’ Learning and Viewpoints
Introduction: Emphasis on active learning in training leads to the development of new educational strategies for teaching theoretical and clinical courses in medical sciences. Active involvement in the teaching-learning process improves learning. The purpose of the present study is to compare two methods of lecturing and puzzle in Medical Emergency Course, regarding students’ learning & viewpoi...
متن کاملFacilitators and Barriers in Application of Peer Learning in Clinical Education according to Nursing Students
Introduction: Peer teaching/learning is an effective educational intervention for students of health sciences in clinical settings. This study explores facilitators and barriers in application of this method in clinical settings. Methods: It is a content analysis qualitative study in which the focus group discussion is used for data gathering. Two groups of nursing students (n=15) of Bushehr U...
متن کامل